JDL
Journal of Digital Libraries

Review Form

Instructions for reviewers:

In order to review your papers online using the web-based review forms, please log in as a reviewer from the journal home page at http://cimic.rutgers.edu/~ijdl, in case you haven't already done so. To do so, choose "reviewer" from the menu, then use your userid/password.

For each paper assigned to you please complete the review form and submit it online via the web using the button at the end.

If for some reason this is not possible, please download the form and send it via email, fax or post to the following address. (NOTE: only if you are NOT using the online web review forms).

Journal Of Digital Libraries
Editorial Office

Rutgers University-CIMIC
180 University Ave.
Newark, NJ 07102
Tel: (973) 353 - 1865
E-mail: jdl@cimic.rutgers.edu


Information for the Editors

Paper No.:
Author(s):
Title:
:

Reviewer Name :
Reviewer's expertise on the topic
1 = I am an expert on the subject of this paper
2 = I am well acquainted with the subject of this paper
3 = I am familiar with the general subject of this paper


Please select one of the following:
Accept for publication
Accept for publication after minor modifications
Review again after major modifications
Reject


COMMENTS to the Editors: (Information to be withheld from authors)




Overall assessment - To be returned to authors

Paper No.:
Author(s):
Title:
:

Please assign scores of from 1 to 6 on the aspects below according to the following scale:
6:Strong Accept (Excellent quality, cutting-edge ideas)
5:Accept (Good quality, sound and interesting results)
4:Weak Accept (Vote acceptance, but won't argue for it)
3:Weak Reject (Don't like it, but won't argue against it)
2:Reject (I will argue to reject this paper)
1:Strong Reject (Unsuitable for publication in this forum)

Relevance to this Journal:
Originality:
Significance:
Technical Quality:
Clarity and organization of the paper:
OVERALL rating:
Does the paper require much rewriting (no/yes)?:
English
1 = No improvement necessary
2 = Could be improved
3 = Must be improved
4 = Unacceptable
:



Detailed Comments to the authors

Please describe the main contributions of the paper, providing details which will help authors improve the quality of their paper.

Please complete all items below.

Typical issues to be addressed include:

  • What are the research contributions?
  • Is the methodology sound?
  • Is the approach or are the results novel?
  • Is adequate attention paid to relevant work?
  • How many of the ideas have been implemented?
  • To what degree have the ideas been evaluated and validated?
  • Is the presentation acceptable?

Information to the author