Review Form 

International Journal Of Digital Libraries -
Special Issue on Multimedia Contents and Management in Digital Libraries 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Information for the Editors
Paper No.: 
Author(s): 
Title    : 

Reviewer Name: 
Reviewer's expertise on the topic:
[ ] I am an expert on the subject of this paper 
[ ] I am well acquainted with the subject of this paper 
[ ] I am familiar with the general subject of this paper 
 

Reviewer's Recommendation on the paper 
[ ] Accept for publication
[ ] Accept for publication after minor modifications
[ ] Review again after major modifications
[ ] Reject 


COMMENTS to the Editors: (Information to be withheld from authors)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Overall assessment - To be returned to authors
Paper No.: 
Author(s): 
Title    : 

Please assign scores of from 1 to 6 on the aspects below according to
the following scale:

  6: Strong Accept (Excellent quality, cutting-edge ideas) 
  5: Accept (Good quality, sound and interesting results) 
  4: Weak Accept (Vote acceptance, but won't argue for it) 
  3: Weak Reject (Don't like it, but won't argue against it) 
  2: Reject (I will argue to reject this paper) 
  1: Strong Reject (Unsuitable for publication in this forum) 


Relevance to this Journal             :
Originality                           : 
Significance                          : 
Technical Quality                     : 
Clarity and organization  of the paper: 
OVERALL rating                        : 
  
      
  
  
  
Does the paper require much rewriting (no/yes)? : 

English
[ ] No improvement necessary
[ ] Could be improved
[ ] Must be improved


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Detailed Comments to the authors
Please describe the main contributions of the paper, providing details
which will help authors improve the quality of their paper.

Please complete all items below. 

Typical issues to be addressed include: 
  - What are the research contributions? 
  - Is the methodology sound? 
  - Is the approach or are the results novel? 
  - Is adequate attention paid to relevant work? 
  - How many of the ideas have been implemented? 
  - To what degree have the ideas been evaluated and validated? 
  - Is the presentation acceptable? 


Information to the authors: